TITLE 19. EDUCATION
PART 2. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY
CHAPTER 66. STATE ADOPTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
SUBCHAPTER
CC.
The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes the repeal of §66.1307, concerning the Instructional Materials and Technology Allotment. The proposed repeal would move the Instructional Materials and Technology Allotment rule to proposed new 19 TAC §67.1001, which is presented in a separate rule action in the Proposed Rules section of this issue of the Texas Register .
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: House Bill (HB) 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, significantly revised Texas Education Code, Chapter 31, related to instructional materials. The proposed repeal of §66.1307 would remove provisions related to the Instructional Materials and Technology Allotment that are being replaced by proposed new 19 TAC §67.1001. Proposed new §67.1001 would clarify the allowable uses of funds in alignment with HB 1605.
FISCAL IMPACT: Todd Davis, associate commissioner of instructional strategy, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposal is in effect, there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.
SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.
COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.
GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would repeal an existing regulation to move information related to the Instructional Materials and Technology Allotment to proposed new 19 TAC §67.1001.
The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not create a new regulation; would not expand or limit an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.
PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Mr. Davis has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be to repeal a rule that is being replaced by proposed new §67.1001. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.
DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data and reporting impact.
PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: The public comment period on the proposal begins March 7, 2025, and ends April 7, 2025. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on March 7, 2025. A form for submitting public comments is available on the TEA website at https://tea.texas.gov/About_TEA/Laws_and_Rules/Commissioner_Rules_(TAC)/Proposed_Commissioner_of_Education_Rules/.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The repeal is proposed under Texas Education Code (TEC), §31.0211, as amended by House Bill (HB) 1605 and HB 4595, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which permits the commissioner to adopt rules regarding the instructional materials and technology allotment, including the amount of the per-student allotment, the authorization of juvenile justice alternative education program allotments, allowed expenditures, required priorities, and adjustments to the number of students for which a district's allotment is calculated; TEC, §31.0212, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which addresses the documentation required for requisitions and disbursements to be approved, districts' online instructional materials ordering system accounts, and school district submission to the commissioner of the title and publication information for any materials the districts purchase with their allotments; TEC, §31.0214, as transferred and amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which permits the commissioner to establish procedures to adjust the instructional materials and technology allotment of school districts experiencing high enrollment growth; TEC, §31.0215, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which addresses allotment purchases, including announcing to districts the amount of their allotments and delayed payment options; TEC, §31.029, which requires the commissioner to adopt rules regarding instructional materials for use in bilingual education classes; TEC, §31.031, which requires the commissioner to adopt rules regarding the purchase of college preparatory instructional materials with the allotment; TEC, §31.076, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which permits the commissioner to adopt rules necessary to implement TEC, Chapter 31, Subchapter B-1, and states that a decision made by the commissioner under the subchapter is final and may not be appealed; and TEC, §31.104, which requires the commissioner to adopt rules that include criteria for determining whether instructional materials and technological equipment are returned in an acceptable condition.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The repeal implements Texas Education Code (TEC), §31.0211, as amended by House Bill (HB) 1605 and HB 4595, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; §31.0212, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; §31.0214, as transferred and amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; §31.0215, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; §31.029; §31.031; §31.076, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; and §31.104.
§
66.1307.
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 24, 2025.
TRD-202500682
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Rulemaking
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 6, 2025
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
CHAPTER 67. STATE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
SUBCHAPTER
AA.
The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes new §§67.1001, 67.1003, and 67.1004, concerning the Instructional Materials and Technology Allotment. The proposed new sections would establish the requirements for the Instructional Materials and Technology Allotment and establish guidance regarding the use of the additional state aid for state-approved instructional materials and open education resource instructional materials.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: Proposed new §67.1001, Instructional Materials and Technology Allotment, would clarify the allowable uses of funds for the Instructional Materials and Technology Allotment that previously existed in 19 TAC §66.1307. This section would also clarify the commissioner's authority to set the allotment amounts for each school district and open-enrollment charter school and special school districts.
House Bill 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, established two new entitlements from the Foundation School Program. The bill also established requirements in Texas Education Code (TEC), Chapter 48, for the access to the funding.
Proposed new §67.1003, Additional State Aid for State-Approved Instructional Materials, would clarify the allowable uses of funds for the entitlement in TEC, §48.307, pertaining to additional state aid for state-approved instructional materials.
Proposed new §67.1004, Additional State Aid for Open Education Resource Instructional Materials, would clarify the allowable uses of funds for the entitlement in TEC, §48.308, pertaining to additional state aid for open education resource instructional materials.
FISCAL IMPACT: Todd Davis, associate commissioner of instructional strategy, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposal is in effect, there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.
SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.
COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.
GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would create new regulations regarding the requirements for the Instructional Materials and Technology Allotment and establish guidance regarding the use of the additional state aid for state-approved instructional materials and open education resource printing entitlements by implementing HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023.
The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not expand, limit, or repeal an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.
PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Mr. Davis has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be to clarify the allowable uses of funding for instructional materials purchases and eligibility for new funding from the Foundation School Program. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.
DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data and reporting impact.
PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: The public comment period on the proposal begins March 7, 2025, and ends April 7, 2025. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on March 7, 2025. A form for submitting public comments is available on the TEA website at https://tea.texas.gov/About_TEA/Laws_and_Rules/Commissioner_Rules_(TAC)/Proposed_Commissioner_of_Education_Rules/.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The new sections are proposed under Texas Education Code (TEC), §31.003(b), as added by House Bill (HB) 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules consistent with TEC, Chapter 31, as necessary to implement a provision of the chapter that the commissioner or the agency is responsible for implementing; TEC, §31.0211, as amended by HB 1605 and HB 4595, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which permits the commissioner to adopt rules regarding the instructional materials and technology allotment, including the amount of the per-student allotment, the authorization of juvenile justice alternative education program allotments, allowed expenditures, required priorities, and adjustments to the number of students for which a district's allotment is calculated; TEC, §31.0212, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which addresses the documentation required for requisitions and disbursements to be approved, districts' online instructional materials ordering system accounts, and school district submissions to the commissioner of the title and publication information for any materials the districts purchase with their allotments; TEC, §31.0215, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which addresses allotment purchases, including announcing to districts the amount of their allotments and delayed payment options; TEC, §31.029, which requires the commissioner to adopt rules regarding instructional materials for use in bilingual education classes; TEC, §31.031, which requires the commissioner to adopt rules regarding the purchase of college preparatory instructional materials with the allotment; TEC, §31.071, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which addresses state-developed open-source instructional materials; TEC, §31.076, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023, which permits the commissioner to adopt rules necessary to implement TEC, Chapter 31, Subchapter B-1, and states that a decision made by the commissioner under the subchapter is final and may not be appealed; TEC, §31.104, which requires the commissioner to adopt rules that include criteria for determining whether instructional materials and technological equipment are returned in an acceptable condition; and TEC, §48.004, which requires the commissioner to adopt rules, act, and require reports consistent with Chapter 48 as necessary to implement and administer the Foundation School Program.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The new sections implement Texas Education Code (TEC), §31.003(b), as added by House Bill (HB) 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; §31.0211, as amended by HB 1605 and HB 4595, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; §31.0212, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; §31.0215, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; §31.029; §31.031; §31.071, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; §31.076, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; §31.104, as amended by HB 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023; and §48.004.
§
67.1001.
(a) The commissioner of education shall determine the amount of the Instructional Materials and Technology Allotment for a school district or an open-enrollment charter school based on Texas Student Data System Public Education Information Management System (TSDS PEIMS) student enrollment data from the fall snapshot collection of the school year preceding the first year of each biennium.
(b) The commissioner shall determine the amount of the allotment for Texas Juvenile Justice Department facilities.
(c) The commissioner shall determine the amount of the allotment for bilingual education based on TSDS PEIMS bilingual enrollment data from the fall collection of the school year preceding the first year of each biennium.
(d) The amount of the allotments determined by the commissioner in this section is final and may not be appealed.
(e) Allotment funds may be used to pay for:
(1) any approved uses outlined in Texas Education Code (TEC), §31.0211(c);
(2) formats of instructional materials that are fully accessible to students with disabilities;
(3) activities related to the local review and adoption of instructional materials; and
(4) software for analyzing the use and effectiveness of instructional materials.
(f) Allotment funds may not be used to pay for:
(1) services for installation;
(2) the physical conduit that transmits data, such as cabling and wiring, or electricity;
(3) office and school supplies;
(4) items that are not directly related to student instruction, such as furniture, athletic equipment, extension cords, temporary contractors, or video surveillance equipment;
(5) travel expenses;
(6) equipment used for moving or storing instructional materials;
(7) instructional material that contains obscene or harmful content or would otherwise cause the school district to which the funds were allotted to be unable to submit the certification required under TEC, §31.11011(a)(1)(B); or
(8) instructional material that incorporates three-cueing in the phonics curriculum required under TEC, Chapter 28.
(g) The allotments for each biennium will be made available for school district and open-enrollment charter school use through the state's online instructional materials ordering system as early as possible in the fiscal year preceding the beginning of the biennium for which the funds have been appropriated.
(h) A school district or an open-enrollment charter school may access its allotment funds for an upcoming school year after submitting to the commissioner:
(1) certification that the school district or open-enrollment charter school has instructional materials that cover all the required Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS), except those for physical education, as required by TEC, §31.1011;
(2) certification that the school district or open-enrollment charter school has used its allotment for only the allowable expenditures provided in subsection (e) of this section; and
(3) information regarding the instructional materials used by the district during the previous school year, including the cost of each material as required by TEC, §31.1012.
(i) Upon completion of the requirements listed in subsection (h) of this section, school districts and open-enrollment charter schools may access their allotment funds by correctly providing all the information required in the state ordering system.
(j) Information required in the state ordering system may include verification of TEKS coverage for certain disbursement requests.
§
67.1003.
(a) The commissioner of education shall determine annually the amount of additional state aid for State Board of Education (SBOE)-approved instructional materials, as outlined in Texas Education Code (TEC), §48.307, for a school district or an open-enrollment charter school based on Texas Student Data System Public Education Information Management System (TSDS PEIMS) student enrollment data from the fall snapshot collection of the current school year.
(b) Before TSDS PEIMS student enrollment data from the fall snapshot collection of the current school year is available, a school district or an open-enrollment charter school will have an expected allotment amount that is based on 90% of the TSDS PEIMS student enrollment data from the fall snapshot collection of the previous school year.
(c) The Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired and the Texas School for the Deaf qualify for this funding under TEC, §30.025 and §30.056, respectively, for funding purposes under TEC, §48.307.
(d) Special purpose school districts authorized by the SBOE qualify for this funding. Texas Tech University K-12 and The University of Texas at Austin High School qualify for this funding under TEC, §48.307, for all free public education students. The University of Texas at Rio Grande Valley qualifies under TEC, §79.10(f). Texas A&M International University qualifies for this funding under TEC, §87.505(g). Lamar University qualifies for this funding under TEC, §96.707(k). The University of North Texas qualifies for this funding under TEC, §101.301(e)(3).
(e) Windham School District qualifies for this funding under TEC, §19.007(b) and (e), for funding purposes under TEC, §48.307.
(f) The Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) and juvenile justice alternative education programs operated by TJJD do not qualify for this funding under TEC, §48.307.
(g) Funds from TEC, §48.307, will be made available for school district and open-enrollment charter school use through the state's online instructional materials ordering system as early as possible each year in the fiscal year for which the funds have been appropriated.
(h) The Texas Education Agency (TEA) will make payment for any remaining balance for a school district's or an open-enrollment charter school's order under this section as the TEC, §48.307, funds become available.
(i) A school district is entitled to the amount of state aid provided by subsection (a) of this section each school year, regardless of whether the district uses the amount during the school year for which the amount was provided.
(j) Texas Government Code, Chapter 2251, does not apply to requisitions placed under this section, per TEC, §31.0215(e).
(k) The additional state aid for SBOE-approved instructional materials outlined in TEC, §48.307, may be used to purchase:
(1) instructional material products placed on the list of approved materials outlined in TEC, §31.022, including any non-text components of the approved product, such as manipulative kits or digital licenses; or
(2) instructional material components from a product on the list of approved materials outlined in TEC, §31.022, only after an initial purchase of all components of the product.
(l) SBOE-Approved Instructional Materials Allotment funds may not be used to purchase:
(1) instructional material or material components not on the list of approved instructional materials as outlined in TEC, §31.022;
(2) instructional material placed on the rejected list of instructional materials; or
(3) instructional material that promotes three-cueing as defined in TEC, §28.0062(a-1).
(m) Subject to TEA approval, the commissioner may exempt, under TEC, §7.056, a school district or an open-enrollment charter school from an initial purchase of each component of an approved product outlined in subsection (k)(2) of this section if the district or charter school can demonstrate that it already possesses an identical or nearly identical component for each student and/or teacher as indicated by the product design.
§
67.1004.
(a) The commissioner of education shall determine the amount of the additional state aid for open education resource (OER) instructional materials for a school district or an open-enrollment charter school based on Texas Student Data System Public Education Information Management System (TSDS PEIMS) student enrollment data from the fall snapshot collection of the current school year.
(b) Before TSDS PEIMS student enrollment data from the fall snapshot collection of the current school year is available, a school district or an open-enrollment charter school will have an expected allotment amount that is based on 90% of the TSDS PEIMS student enrollment data from the fall snapshot collection of the previous school year.
(c) The Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired and the Texas School for the Deaf qualify for this funding under TEC, §30.025 and §30.056, respectively, for funding purposes under TEC, §48.308.
(d) Special purpose school districts authorized by the State Board of Education (SBOE) qualify for this funding. Texas Tech University K-12 and The University of Texas at Austin High School qualify for this funding under TEC, §48.308, for all free public education students. The University of Texas at Rio Grande Valley qualifies under TEC, §79.10(f). Texas A&M International University qualifies for this funding under TEC, §87.505(g). Lamar University qualifies for this funding under TEC, §96.707(k). The University of North Texas qualifies for this funding under TEC, §101.301(e)(3).
(e) Windham School District qualifies for this funding under TEC, §19.007(b) and (e), for funding purposes under TEC, §48.308.
(f) The Texas Juvenile Justice Department (TJJD) and juvenile justice alternative education programs operated by TJJD do not qualify for this funding under TEC, §48.308.
(g) Funds may only be used for the costs incurred or for which the district is obligated to pay during the school year in which the aid is provided.
(h) Requisitions for funding must be submitted in the online requisition and disbursement system required in TEC, §31.0212(e), before August 31 of the fiscal year in which the aid is provided.
(i) The entitlements for each year will be made available for school district and open-enrollment charter school use through the state's online instructional materials ordering system as early as possible in the fiscal year for which the funds have been appropriated.
(j) Texas Government Code, Chapter 2251, does not apply to requisitions placed under this section per TEC, §31.0125(e).
(k) The additional state aid for OER instructional materials outlined in TEC, §48.308, may be used to purchase:
(1) OER instructional material made available under TEC, Chapter 31, Subchapter B-1, and placed on the list of approved materials outlined in TEC, §31.022, including any non-text components of the approved product, such as manipulative kits; and
(2) OER instructional material components made available under TEC, Chapter 31, Subchapter B-1, and placed on the list of approved materials outlined in TEC, §31.022, only after an initial purchase of all components of the product.
(l) The additional state aid for OER instructional materials outlined in TEC, §48.308, may not be used to purchase or reimburse for:
(1) instructional material or material components not on the list of approved instructional materials as outlined in TEC, §31.022;
(2) instructional material placed on the rejected list of instructional materials;
(3) instructional material that promotes three-cueing as defined in TEC, §28.0062(a-1); or
(4) printing of SBOE-approved OER material, which may be otherwise procured through a requisition in EMAT.
(m) The commissioner may grant a waiver under TEC, §7.056, to exempt a school district or an open-enrollment charter school from an initial purchase of each component of an approved product outlined in subsection (k)(2) of this section if the district or charter school can demonstrate that it already possesses an identical or near-identical component for each student and/or teacher as indicated by the product design.
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 24, 2025.
TRD-202500683
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Rulemaking
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 6, 2025
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
CHAPTER 149. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING EDUCATOR STANDARDS
SUBCHAPTER
AA.
The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes the repeal of §149.1001 and new §149.1001, concerning teacher standards. The proposed repeal and new rule would reflect alignment with recent updates to State Board for Educator Certification (SBEC) rules in 19 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 235, Subchapters A-D, as required by House Bill (HB) 1605, 88th Texas Legislature, Regular Session, 2023.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND JUSTIFICATION: Section 149.1001 identifies the performance standards to be used to inform the training, appraisal, and professional development of Early Childhood-Grade 12 pre-service and in-service teachers in Texas.
The proposed repeal of and new §149.1001 would align with recent updates to SBEC rules in 19 TAC Chapter 235, Subchapters A-D, as required by HB 1605.
The proposed repeal of and new §149.1001 would reflect a reorganization of the teacher standards and would also include definitions that provide clarity for educators and promote a common understanding of terms used within the updated teacher standards.
The standards included in proposed new §149.1001 would outline the necessary knowledge and skills related to instructional preparation, instructional delivery and assessment, content pedagogy for all teachers and for teachers leading English language arts and reading and math classes, learning environments, and professional practices and responsibilities.
FISCAL IMPACT: Kelvey Oeser, deputy commissioner of educator support, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposal is in effect, there are no additional costs to state or local government, including school districts and open-enrollment charter schools, required to comply with the proposal.
LOCAL EMPLOYMENT IMPACT: The proposal has no effect on local economy; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code, §2001.022.
SMALL BUSINESS, MICROBUSINESS, AND RURAL COMMUNITY IMPACT: The proposal has no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, or rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, specified in Texas Government Code, §2006.002, is required.
COST INCREASE TO REGULATED PERSONS: The proposal does not impose a cost on regulated persons, another state agency, a special district, or a local government and, therefore, is not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0045.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT: The proposal does not impose a burden on private real property and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043.
GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT: TEA staff prepared a Government Growth Impact Statement assessment for this proposed rulemaking. During the first five years the proposed rulemaking would be in effect, it would repeal an existing regulation and create a new regulation to align with recent updates to SBEC rules in 19 TAC Chapter 235, Subchapters A-D, as required by HB 1605.
The proposed rulemaking would not create or eliminate a government program; would not require the creation of new employee positions or elimination of existing employee positions; would not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; would not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; would not expand or limit an existing regulation; would not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to its applicability; and would not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.
PUBLIC BENEFIT AND COST TO PERSONS: Ms. Oeser has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposal would be to identify the performance standards to be used to inform the training, appraisal, and professional development of Early Childhood-Grade 12 pre-service and in-service teachers in Texas; to reflect a reorganization of the teacher standards; to include definitions that provide clarity for educators; and to align the rule with recent updates to SBEC rules in 19 TAC Chapter 235, Subchapters A-D, as required by HB 1605. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposal.
DATA AND REPORTING IMPACT: The proposal would have no data and reporting impact.
PRINCIPAL AND CLASSROOM TEACHER PAPERWORK REQUIREMENTS: TEA has determined that the proposal would not require a written report or other paperwork to be completed by a principal or classroom teacher.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: The public comment period on the proposal begins March 7, 2025, and ends April 7, 2025. A request for a public hearing on the proposal submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 14 calendar days after notice of the proposal has been published in the Texas Register on March 7, 2025. A form for submitting public comments is available on the TEA website at https://tea.texas.gov/About_TEA/Laws_and_Rules/Commissioner_Rules_(TAC)/Proposed_Commissioner_of_Education_Rules/.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The repeal is proposed under Texas Education Code, §21.351, which authorizes the commissioner to adopt a recommended appraisal process and criteria on which to appraise the performance of teachers.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The repeal implements Texas Education Code, §21.351.
§
149.1001.
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 24, 2025.
TRD-202500686
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Rulemaking
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 6, 2025
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The new section is proposed under Texas Education Code, §21.351, which authorizes the commissioner to adopt a recommended appraisal process and criteria on which to appraise the performance of teachers.
CROSS REFERENCE TO STATUTE. The new section implements Texas Education Code, §21.351.
§
149.1001.
(a) Purpose. The standards identified in this section are performance standards used to inform the preparation, appraisal, and professional development of Early Childhood-Grade 12 pre-service and in-service teachers in Texas. The standards:
(1) emphasize the knowledge and skills required for teachers to select, evaluate, internalize, and implement high-quality instructional materials;
(2) assume that practicing teachers are aware of Open Educational Resource (OER) instructional materials, customize materials as directed by their district, and engage in initial lesson design when directed by their district;
(3) describe the knowledge and skills required for teachers to prepare, deliver, and assess instruction that results in positive outcomes for all students;
(4) describe the knowledge and skills required for teachers to build positive relationships with and among students in a safe and productive learning environment;
(5) reflect research- and evidence-based practices that ensure all students are held to rigorous grade-level academic and nonacademic standards; and
(6) define a teacher's role as a professional, ethical, and reflective practitioner.
(b) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1) Academic language--the oral, written, auditory, and visual language specific to a discipline. It includes vocabulary, grammar, punctuation, syntax, discipline-specific terminology, and rhetorical conventions that allow students to acquire knowledge and academic skills.
(2) Accelerated instruction--includes aligned research-driven strategies and supports within a multi-tiered instructional model that helps students make more than one year of growth in one year of time.
(3) Complex text--texts that provide students opportunities to work with new language, knowledge, and ways of thinking. Text complexity is evaluated along quantitative dimensions such as word and sentence length; qualitative dimensions such as text structure, levels of meaning, and language conventions; and considerations including the reader's background, motivation, and knowledge of the topic.
(4) Deliberate practice--practice that is systematic, requires focused attention, and is conducted with the specific goal of improving performance.
(5) Encoding--the process by which information is initially coded to be stored and retrieved. Encoding requires attention and is aided by reducing extraneous cognitive load or information in the learning environment.
(6) Engagement--a state in which students are cognitively and behaviorally connected to and involved in their learning experience, characterized by participation, curiosity, and perseverance.
(7) Evidence-based--a concept or strategy that has been evaluated as a whole and found to have positive effects when implemented with programmatic fidelity.
(8) Explanatory feedback--feedback that provides the learner with an explanation of strengths and weaknesses related to the learning activity or assignment.
(9) Explicit instruction--instruction in which the teacher's actions are clear, unambiguous, direct, and visible. Explicit instruction makes it clear what the students are to do and learn.
(10) Fixed personality traits--the misconception that personality traits become fixed at certain stages of an individual's development and do not change over time.
(11) Formative assessment--A deliberate process used by teachers during instruction that provides actionable feedback used to elicit and use evidence of student learning to improve students' attainment of learning targets.
(12) Hemispheric dominance--the misconception that each brain hemisphere is specialized to process information differently and that the dominant hemisphere determines a person's personality and way of thinking.
(13) High-quality instructional materials--instructional materials that ensure full coverage of Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS); are aligned to evidence-based best practices in the relevant content areas; support all learners, including students with disabilities, emergent bilingual students, and students identified as gifted and talented; enable frequent progress monitoring through embedded and aligned assessments; include implementation supports for teachers; and provide teacher- and student-facing lesson-level materials.
(14) Instructional preparation--describes the process by which a teacher uses knowledge of students and student learning to prepare instructional delivery to a unique group of students. Instructional preparation may include activities such as lesson design, evaluation of instructional materials, and lesson internalization.
(15) Interleaving--an instructional technique that arranges practice of topics in such a way that consecutive problems cannot be solved by the same strategy.
(16) Just-in-time supports--a learning acceleration strategy that integrates small, timely supports to address gaps in the most critical prerequisite knowledge and skills that students will need to access grade-level content in upcoming units.
(17) Learning styles--the disproven theory that identifies learners by type (visual, auditory, reading and writing, and kinesthetic) and adapts instruction to the individual's learning style.
(18) Lesson design--describes the process by which a teacher develops the planned learning experiences and related instructional materials for a topic. Lesson design incorporates activities including developing objectives, learning experiences, sequencing, scaffolds, resources, materials, tasks, assessments, and planned instructional practices.
(19) Lesson internalization--an aspect of instructional preparation specific to teaching a lesson or unit. It includes activities such as evaluating sequencing, learning goals, and expected outcomes; using assessment data to identify prior knowledge; studying lesson content; rehearsing lesson delivery; identifying possible misconceptions; and planning instructional strategies, materials, and pacing.
(20) Metacognition--the awareness of how one's mind learns and thinks and the use of that awareness to optimize the efficiency of learning and cognition.
(21) Multiple means of engagement--a range of options provided to engage and motivate students in learning.
(22) Multiple means of representation--a range of options provided in the ways that information is presented to students.
(23) Multiple means of action and expression--a range of options provided in the ways that students express or demonstrate their learning.
(24) Open educational resource instructional materials--state-developed materials included on the list of approved instructional materials maintained by the State Board of Education under Texas Education Code (TEC), §31.022, where the underlying intellectual property is either owned by the state of Texas or can be freely used and modified by the state in perpetuity.
(25) Patterns of student thinking--common patterns in the ways in which students think about and develop understanding and skill in relation to particular topics and problems.
(26) Productive struggle--expending effort to understand a challenging situation and determine a course of action when no obvious strategy is stated and receiving support that encourages persistence without removing the challenge.
(27) Recall--also referred to as "retrieval," the mental process of retrieving information that was previously encoded and stored in the brain.
(28) Remediation--strategies that focus on the drilling of isolated skills that bear little resemblance to current curriculum. Activities connect to past standards and aim to master content from past years.
(29) Research-based--a concept or strategy with positive findings from studies effective in isolation or in combination with other researched strategies or evidence-based programs.
(30) Retrieval practice--also referred to as "testing effect" or "active recall," the finding that trying to remember previously learned material, including by responding to questions, tests, assessments, etc., leads to better retention than restudying or being retold the material for an equivalent amount of time.
(31) Science of learning--the summarized existing cognitive-science, cognitive psychology, educational psychology, and neuroscience research on how people learn, as it connects to practical implications for teaching.
(32) Second language acquisition--the process through which individuals leverage their primary language to learn a new language. A dynamic process of learning and acquiring proficiency in the English language, supported by exposure to comprehensible input, interaction, formal instruction, and access to resources and support in English and primary language.
(33) Spaced practice/distributed practice--practice opportunities for learning are sequenced in a way that students actively retrieve learned information from long-term memory through multiple opportunities over time with rest intervals in between.
(34) State Board of Education-approved instructional materials--materials included on the list of approved instructional materials maintained by the State Board of Education under TEC, §31.022.
(35) Summative assessment--medium- to high-stakes assessments, administered at the conclusion of an instructional period that are used to evaluate student learning, knowledge, proficiency, or mastery of a learning target.
(c) Standards.
(1) Standard 1--Instructional Preparation. Teachers understand how students learn, and they prepare for instructional delivery by designing lessons, evaluating instructional materials, leveraging their knowledge of students, and engaging in a thorough process for lesson internalization.
(A) Teachers apply basic principles from the learning sciences to prepare for instruction.
(i) Teachers understand learning as an active and social process of meaning-making that results in changes in student knowledge and behavior based on connections between past and new experiences.
(ii) Teachers prepare instruction that uses research- and evidence-based teaching strategies for eliciting and sustaining attention and motivation, supporting memory encoding and recall, and deeply integrating new experiences with prior knowledge, such as interleaving, spacing, metacognition, and distributed practice.
(iii) Teachers recognize misconceptions about learning, the brain, and child and adolescent development, including myths such as learning styles, personality traits, and hemispheric dominance, and avoid unsupported instructional practices based on these misunderstandings.
(B) Teachers evaluate instructional materials and select or customize the highest quality district-approved option to prepare for instruction.
(i) Teachers identify the components of high-quality instructional materials, such as a logical scope and sequence, clear learning objectives, grade-level content, explicit instruction, student engagement, academic language, deliberate practice, and assessment, appropriate to the discipline.
(ii) Teachers identify the benefits of using high-quality instructional materials.
(iii) Teachers apply knowledge of the components of high-quality instructional materials to design, select, or customize materials when appropriate.
(iv) Teachers analyze instructional materials and digital resources to ensure quality, rigor, and access to grade-level content.
(v) Teachers use high-quality materials to plan instruction that connects students' prior understanding and real-world experiences to new content and contexts.
(C) Teachers understand initial lesson design and, when district-approved materials are not available and when directed by their district, engage in initial lesson design using science of learning concepts.
(i) Teachers design lessons based on the components of high-quality instructional materials, such as a logical scope and sequence, clear learning objectives, and grade-level content.
(ii) Teachers design lessons that effectively connect learning objectives with explicit instruction, student engagement, academic language, deliberate practice, and assessment.
(iii) Teachers design lessons that connect students' prior understanding and real-world experiences to new content and contexts.
(iv) Teachers plan for the use of digital tools and resources to engage students in active, deep learning.
(D) Teachers ensure lesson sequence and materials meet the needs of all learners and adapt methods when appropriate.
(i) Teachers plan for the use of multiple means to engage students, varied ways of representing information, and options for students to demonstrate their learning.
(ii) Teachers leverage student data to prepare flexible student groups that facilitate learning for all students.
(iii) Teachers differentiate instruction and align methods and techniques to diverse student needs, including acceleration, just-in-time supports, technology, intervention, linguistic supports, appropriate scaffolding, and implementation of individualized education programs.
(E) Teachers recognize students' backgrounds (familial, educational, linguistic, and developmental) as assets and apply knowledge of students to engage them in meaningful learning.
(i) Teachers plan to present information in a meaningful way that activates or provides any prerequisite knowledge to maximize student learning.
(ii) Teachers collaborate with other professionals, use resources, and plan research- and evidence-based instructional strategies to anticipate and respond to the unique needs of students, including disabilities, giftedness, bilingualism, and biliteracy.
(iii) Teachers plan instructional practices and strategies that support language acquisition so that language is comprehensible and instruction is fully accessible.
(iv) Teachers apply knowledge of how each category of disability under the Individuals with Disabilities Act (20 U.S.C. §1400, et seq.) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. §794) can affect student learning and development.
(F) Teachers engage in a thorough process of lesson internalization to prepare well-organized, sequential instruction that builds on students' prior knowledge.
(i) Teachers identify how the intentional sequencing of units, lessons, and learning tasks supports student knowledge and mastery throughout the year.
(ii) Teachers identify how the learning goals of units and lessons are aligned to state standards.
(iii) Teachers use assessment data to identify prior knowledge and plan for the learning needs of students.
(iv) Teachers internalize lesson content by reading the texts, completing learning tasks and assessments, rehearsing lesson delivery, and identifying any personal gaps in understanding.
(v) Teachers plan for pacing, use of teacher resources, and transitions between activities.
(vi) Teachers create or analyze and customize exemplar responses and anticipate potential barriers to learning.
(vii) Teachers strategically plan instructional strategies, formative assessments, technology, scaffolds, and enrichment to make learning accessible to all students.
(2) Standard 2--Instructional Delivery and Assessment. Teachers intentionally apply their knowledge of students and the learning process to implement high-quality instruction and assessment practices that are research- and evidence-based and informed by student work.
(A) Teachers deliver research- and evidence-based instruction to meet the needs of all learners and adapt methods when appropriate.
(i) Teachers effectively communicate grade-level expectations, objectives, and goals to help all students reach high levels of achievement.
(ii) Teachers apply research- and evidence-based teaching strategies for eliciting and sustaining attention and motivation and supporting memory encoding and recall, such as interleaving, spacing, metacognition, and distributed practice.
(iii) Teachers ensure a high degree of student engagement through explicit instruction, student discussion, feedback, and opportunities for deliberate practice.
(iv) Teachers apply research- and evidence-based teaching strategies that connect students' prior understanding and real-world experiences to new content and contexts and invite student perspectives.
(v) Teachers implement appropriate scaffolds in response to student needs.
(vi) Teachers strategically implement tools, technology, and procedures that lead to increased participation from all students, elicit patterns of student thinking, and highlight varied responses.
(vii) Teachers provide multiple means of engagement to encourage all students to remain persistent in the face of challenges.
(viii) Teachers collaborate with other educational professionals, when appropriate, to deliver instruction that addresses students' academic and non-academic needs.
(B) Teachers scaffold instruction, from initial knowledge and skill development through automaticity, toward complex, higher-order thinking, providing opportunities for deeper learning.
(i) Teachers set high expectations and facilitate rigorous grade-level learning experiences for all students that encourage them to apply disciplinary and cross-disciplinary knowledge to real-world problems.
(ii) Teachers apply instructional strategies to deliberately engage all students in critical thinking and problem solving.
(iii) Teachers validate student responses, using them to advance learning for all students.
(iv) Teachers respond to student errors and misconceptions with prompts or questions that build new understanding on prior knowledge.
(v) Teachers use strategic questioning to build and deepen student understanding.
(vi) Teachers strategically incorporate technology that removes barriers and allows students to interact with the curriculum in more authentic, significant, and effective ways.
(C) Teachers consistently check for understanding, give feedback, and make lesson adjustments as necessary.
(i) Teachers use a variety of formative assessments during instruction to gauge and respond to student progress and address misconceptions.
(ii) Teachers implement frequent, low- or no-stakes assessments to promote retrieval of learned information.
(iii) Teachers continually monitor and assess students' progress to guide instructional outcomes and determine next steps to ensure student mastery of grade-level content.
(iv) Teachers build student capacity to self-monitor their progress.
(v) Teachers provide frequent, timely, and specific explanatory feedback that emphasizes effort and improvement and acknowledges students' strengths and areas for growth.
(vi) Teachers strategically implement instructional strategies, formative assessments, scaffolds, and enrichment to make learning accessible to all students.
(vii) Teachers set goals for each student in response to previous outcomes from formative and summative assessments.
(viii) Teachers involve all students in self-assessment, goal setting, and monitoring progress.
(D) Teachers implement formative and summative methods of measuring and monitoring student progress through the regular collection, review, and analysis of data.
(i) Teachers individually and collaboratively review and analyze student work to understand students' thinking, identify strengths and progress toward mastery, and identify gaps in knowledge.
(ii) Teachers combine results from different measures to develop a holistic picture of students' strengths and learning needs.
(iii) Teachers apply multiple means of assessing learning, including the use of digital tools, to accommodate according to students' learning needs, linguistic differences, and/or varying levels of background knowledge.
(iv) Teachers use assessment results to inform and adjust instruction and intervention.
(v) Teachers clearly communicate the results of assessments with students, including setting goals and identifying areas of strength and opportunities for improvement.
(3) Standard--Content Pedagogy Knowledge and Skills. Teachers show a full understanding of their content and related pedagogy and the appropriate grade-level TEKS.
(A) Teachers understand the major concepts, key themes, multiple perspectives, assumptions, processes of inquiry, structure, and real-world applications of their grade-level and subject-area content.
(i) Teachers demonstrate a thorough understanding of and competence in the use of open education resource instructional materials when available for the grade level and subject area.
(ii) Teachers have expertise in how their content vertically and horizontally aligns with the grade-level/subject-area continuum, leading to an integrated curriculum across grade levels and content areas.
(iii) Teachers identify gaps in students' knowledge of subject matter and communicate with their leaders and colleagues to ensure that these gaps are adequately addressed across grade levels and subject areas.
(iv) Teachers deliberately and regularly share multiple different examples of student representations and resolutions.
(v) Teachers stay current with developments, new content, new approaches, and changing methods of instructional delivery within their discipline.
(B) Teachers demonstrate content-specific pedagogy that meets the needs of diverse learners, using engaging instructional materials to connect prior content knowledge to new learning.
(i) Teachers teach the key content knowledge, the key skills of the discipline, and the requisite linguistic skills to construct, the information into usable knowledge and make it accessible to all learners by constructing it into usable knowledge.
(ii) Teachers make appropriate and authentic connections across disciplines, subjects, and students' real-world experiences to build knowledge from year to year.
(iii) Teachers provide multiple means of representation and engagement to promote literacy and ensure discipline-specific academic language is accessible for all students.
(iv) Teachers explicitly teach, encourage, and reinforce the use of academic language, including vocabulary, use of symbols, and labeling.
(v) Teachers prepare for and apply scaffolds in the lesson to make content accessible to all students, including diverse learners such as emergent bilingual students, students with disabilities, and students working above and below grade level.
(vi) Teachers engage students in productive struggle by allowing them time to work, asking questions to deepen their thinking, encouraging multiple approaches, and praising effort on successful and unsuccessful attempts.
(C) Teachers demonstrate research- and evidence-based best practices specific to planning, instruction, and assessment of mathematics.
(i) Teachers use multiple means of representation to communicate the relationship between mathematical concepts and mathematical procedures.
(ii) Teachers engage students in recursive lesson activities that reinforce automaticity in prerequisite knowledge and skills to mitigate the use of working memory when engaging those knowledge and skills as task complexity increases.
(iii) Teachers use multiple means of representation to engage students in mathematical tasks that deepen students' understanding of conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and mathematical reasoning.
(iv) Teachers prepare and deliver instruction and questioning to deliberately solicit different explanations, representations, solutions, and reasoning from all students.
(v) Teachers prepare and deliver explicit instruction and modeling that links grade-level conceptual understanding with mathematical procedures and avoids shortcuts to problem solving.
(vi) Teachers analyze instructional plans to ensure an appropriate balance between conceptual understanding and procedural fluency.
(vii) Teachers facilitate discourse through regular opportunities for students to communicate the relationship between mathematical concepts and mathematical procedures.
(viii) Teachers provide time for students to collaboratively and independently apply conceptual understanding and procedural fluency to problem-solving.
(ix) Teachers communicate and model the connections between mathematics and other fields that use mathematics to problem solve, make decisions, and incorporate real-world applications in instruction.
(x) Teachers explicitly teach and model that math abilities are expandable and improvable.
(D) Teachers demonstrate research- and evidence-based best practices specific to planning, instruction, and assessment of language arts and reading.
(i) Teachers analyze instructional materials in preparation for instruction to ensure they provide grade-level appropriate, systematic, and explicit practice in foundational literacy skills.
(ii) Teachers analyze instructional materials in preparation for instruction to ensure that foundational literacy skills are reached at each grade level.
(iii) Teachers implement clear and explicit reading instruction aligned to the Science of Teaching Reading competencies and engage students in deliberate practice to make meaning from text.
(iv) Teachers identify and analyze grade-level and complex texts for quality in preparation for instruction.
(v) Teachers prepare and deliver explicit reading instruction that uses grade-level and complex texts to build student knowledge.
(vi) Teachers strategically plan and implement supports such as read-aloud and questioning at varied levels of complexity to support comprehension of high-quality complex texts.
(vii) Teachers engage students in writing practice, including text-based writing that builds comprehension and higher-order thinking skills.
(viii) Teachers engage students in speaking practice that builds comprehension, language acquisition, and higher-order thinking skills.
(ix) Teachers use high-quality assessments to monitor grade-level appropriate foundational skills development.
(x) Teachers implement and analyze a variety of high-quality literacy assessments to monitor grade-level appropriate comprehension and identify gaps.
(xi) Teachers apply just-in-time supports and intervention on prerequisite skills and continually monitor to determine the need for additional learning support.
(4) Standard 4--Learning Environment. Teachers maintain a safe and supportive learning environment that is characterized by respectful interactions with students, consistent routines, high expectations, and the development of students' self-regulation skills.
(A) Teachers establish, implement, and communicate consistent routines for effective classroom management, including clear expectations for student behavior and positive interventions, that maintain a productive learning environment for all students.
(i) Teachers arrange their classrooms and virtual learning spaces in an organized way that is safe, flexible, and accessible to maximize learning that accommodates all students' learning and physical needs.
(ii) Teachers implement consistent classroom and behavior management systems to maintain an environment where all students are engaged and can reach academic and nonacademic goals.
(iii) Teachers model and provide explicit instruction on effective behavior regulation skills to build students' resilience and self-discipline.
(iv) Teachers maintain a safe and positive culture of student ownership and group accountability that fosters engagement by all students in the classroom expectations, culture, and norms.
(B) Teachers lead and maintain classroom environments in which students are motivated and cognitively engaged in learning.
(i) Teachers maintain a classroom environment that is based on high expectations and student self-efficacy.
(ii) Teachers strategically use instructional time, including transitions, to maximize learning.
(iii) Teachers manage and facilitate strategic and flexible groupings to maximize student learning.
(5) Standard 5--Professional Practices and Responsibilities. Teachers are self-aware and consistently hold themselves to a high standard for individual development. They collaborate with other educational professionals; communicate regularly with stakeholders; maintain professional relationships; comply with federal, state, and local laws; and conduct themselves ethically and with integrity.
(A) Teachers model ethical and respectful behavior and demonstrate integrity in all settings and situations.
(i) Teachers understand and comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws pertaining to the professional behaviors and responsibilities of educators.
(ii) Teachers adhere to the Educators' Code of Ethics in §247.2 of this title (relating to Code of Ethics and Standard Practices for Texas Educators), including following policies and procedures at their specific school placement(s).
(iii) Teachers demonstrate understanding of their role in strengthening American democracy and are willing to support and defend the constitutions of the United States and Texas.
(iv) Teachers advocate for and apply knowledge of students' progress and learning plans through the maintenance of thorough and accurate records.
(v) Teachers model and promote for students the use of safe, ethical, and legal practices with digital tools and technology.
(B) Teachers actively self-reflect on their practice and collaborate with other educational professionals to deepen knowledge, demonstrate leadership, and improve their instructional effectiveness.
(i) Teachers apply consistent reflective practices, analysis of student work, and video evidence of teaching to identify and communicate professional learning needs.
(ii) Teachers seek and apply job-embedded feedback from colleagues, including supervisors, mentors, coaches, and peers.
(iii) Teachers establish and strive to achieve professional goals to strengthen their instructional effectiveness and better meet students' needs.
(iv) Teachers engage in relevant professional learning opportunities that align with their growth goals and student learning needs.
(v) Teachers seek to lead other adults on campus through professional learning communities, grade- or subject-level team leadership, committee membership, or other opportunities.
(vi) Teachers collaborate with educational professionals to ensure learning is accessible and enables all students to reach their academic and non-academic goals.
(C) Teachers communicate consistently, clearly, and respectfully with all community stakeholders, including students, parents and families, colleagues, administrators, and staff.
(i) Teachers clearly communicate the mission, vision, and goals of the school to students, colleagues, parents and families, and other community members.
(ii) Teachers communicate regularly, clearly, and appropriately with families about student progress, providing detailed and constructive feedback in a language that is accessible to families to support students' developmental and learning goals.
(iii) Teachers build mutual understanding of expectations with students, parents, and families through clear, respectful, and consistent communication methods.
(iv) Teachers communicate with students and families regularly about the importance of collecting data and monitoring progress of student outcomes, sharing timely and comprehensible feedback so they understand students' goals and progress.
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 24, 2025.
TRD-202500687
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Rulemaking
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 6, 2025
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497